Current 6th grade vs. Pull Out
PROS of Current, Self-contained 6th Grade Program
More hours of gifted education, with all instruction and curriculum at the appropriate level and rate for gifted learners.
Students discover that they aren't always the top in their classroom and that they don't automatically get good grades. They must study and put forth effort. They can no longer "slide" through on their innate abilities but must actually work.
Teacher has more time to individualize each student's education.
More one-on-one time with a gifted-sensitive teacher whose training and experience provide an understanding of the hidden problems a gifted student may have.
Full day of social and emotional support from peers.
"Peer pressure" creates an environment that encourages academic success and accepts individuality--rather than denying intellectual abilities to conform. This helps to build a better sense of understanding why and how they fit in, at a time in their life when they are going through many physical, mental and emotional changes that may make them feel alone. Research shows that such support in school is especially crucial for adolescent girls and students whose home culture does not encourage academic success.
Students receive report card grades for their gifted classes. They do not have to "make up" work they missed in the classroom while being "pulled out." Therefore, being gifted is not perceived as a punishment.
This is the grade that most gifted students are first pushed to their mental limits and realize what potential they have, often changing their direction of education and career choices.
This is the first year of three of the most intense years of gifted education in the school system and prepares them for the 7th and 8th grade programs.
Helps to make up for the shortcomings of the K through 5th grade program. (Limited time and lack of individualized education.)
One of the three most revered years of gifted education in the area.
CONS of Current 6th Grade Program
Program does not start early enough for some of the more advanced gifted students.
Students need to be pulled from their home schools.
Students need to take a shuttle bus from their home school to the school hosting the 6th grade program.
Students have limited time--lunch, recess, and special classes--to interact with non-gifted peers.
Some students don't like having to spend so much time on school work, getting grades lower than an A, or not being recognized as the "smartest" kid in their class or school.
QUESTIONS
What criteria--other than the number of identified gifted students--were used to make the decision that the 6th grade program should be eliminated?
What proof does the district have that the CURRENT SIP program is providing the appropriate quality and level of instruction to meet the needs of all K-5 gifted children?
Without more individualized GIEPs--including more accurate Present Levels of Educational Performance--will "more time" in SIP for K-5 students actually result in more "learning?" Will the additional time be spent on busy work, "enrichment," or "acceleration?" Who will ensure/document that needs are being met in the regular classroom?
If 6th grade is eliminated:
What is the district's specific plan in terms of amount of time and training of "regular" and "gifted teachers?"
What amount of time specifically, by grade level, will K-6 gifted students spend with "gifted teachers' and interacting with their intellectual peers?
If the district has historically shown that 6th grade students can handle and benefit from the current format, how will those academic, social and emotional needs --which should be clearly documented in the PLEP--be met in a "regular classroom" with a "pull out" or "push in" format?
What will the impact be on the 7th and 8th grade GT programs--which build upon the 6th grade-- if 6th is eliminated?
What criteria were used to determine that 5th graders would not benefit from also being in a self-contained classroom?
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
Dorothy D. Call Administrative Center
3000 Donallen Drive Bensalem, PA 19020
(215) 750-2800 , Ext. 4100 Fax: (215) 359-0181
SCHOOL BOARD
Board of School Directors December 7, 2009
Heather D. Nicholas President 2011
5116 Windward Lane 215-639-5970
Bensalem, PA 19020
Harry R. Kramer Vice President 2011
6248 Fulton Avenue W. 215-741-4378
Bensalem, PA 19020
Yagneshkuma S. Choksi 215-639-2913 2013
2488 Headhouse Square S.
Bensalem, PA 19020
Ralph G. Douglass 215-639-4816 2013
2579 Forrest Avenue
Bensalem, PA 19020
Wayne Lewis 215-757-1404 2011
1780 Bensalem Boulevard
Bensalem, PA 19020
Chester F. Marshall, III 2011
3036 Mechanicsville Road 215-638-9035
Bensalem, PA 19020
Kim J. Rivera 215-633-0308 2013
5112 N. Hunters Court
Bensalem, PA 19020
Eugene A. Rothenberg 215-639-9119 2011
3613 Valley Meadows Drive
Bensalem, PA 19020
Sherri L. Underland 215-783-6572 2013
5903 Michael Drive
Bensalem, PA 19020